On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:58 -0700, Trever L. Adams wrote: > > If I had money to throw at it, I think I would encourage another to be > written (maybe in C/C++). Take a look at xmlroff: http://xmlroff.sourceforge.net/ > Also, I just saw that [FOP] hasn't changed since 2003 yesterday I haven't read the FOP developer lists for a while, but they were/are involved in a major rewrite because of architectural problems with the code that had previously been release. I don't know what the current status is though... Check the FOP developer list archives.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
