-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 13:06 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Changes in the Fedora releng dropped glibc-headers.i686 from the x86_64 > compose after the Fedora 26 release. This is not in itself a problem > (glibc-devel.i686 is fine if its dependency is matched by > glibc-headers.x86_64). However, I have received a report that an > installed glibc-headers.i686 package prevents upgrades to newer glibc > versions. This might be true because dnf doesn't allow erasing of packages unless -- allowerasing is passed. > Are cross-architecture Obsoletes: supported in any way? Is there a > recommended way to deal with this situation? Well, from my user perspective I think they are supported "as long as it works". The multilib generation is very hacky/tricky. I would open a ticket for releng to fix such issues. - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlpUyzQACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0x/7Q//UbjNfPPuEn5Q3yIpkh8jS8udOXF7qermUcvJ8+DHLG45yj2/81Snv8k4 zrXmtPGRGcQo+oGN5dz8DojjnF5oTGwseFoT9ZIrHRoJEdtNAJMWuBgrQyx/DlkY 8F1GFt8ZHm72TiYAzUlLzAn2A6W62RSmWKNyKYheoFIwIbgRstJm8KNwxDmnuORP sf+PMM91hqep3nIiYE/rbXBtviZjIwSKRNDrJ6ZvE908hdCHJS99fMVp1Iq0P77j orcCrgVfJg19rfS8trA0OO5hMNwi66SQRNKwSUAHjdeZTFq/cduXzgu0Z1nrG2j6 tY3kc6645dINFyzNyoYDRah+GEBpmkWQsBoww3LQm3k0Y9+mVfeRhc+mw3xoo5W/ nBpTsG9f+2KbDX1EWCmv9KLbvMAmnu5TOMTD/oH839N3HI83WH3BF2dl5B1qC3+p 85ri4jVbd1P3mWUCnoljnWkGeq84bphTgioidB4Hl+EXkOvVmfr+X7ECXomWgNDt s6NMUR9pmMWk4Z5LQA+gcd5TXiXITjh1W1wvxA1czbhXj8LKep9BTHwtb7Z8vyeJ 1CC0xfwrILnzYjz3QGhUhFxwDYr5yXa+NYszQrEcJECsVz+lxuKixNEk1bnCCsbz f+8+s+GoIA4/OeUqv77p4jlX4Vhg3uYYi39wqE7AB7C+AD2iAxo= =iqJf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
