Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/08/2018 06:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different >> upstream tar balls? Basically have >> >> Source0:http://server.com/package1/package1.tar >> Source1:http://server.com/package2/package2.tar >> >> Then I would, by hand, untar Source1 into Source0 directory. > > That's fairly common. I don't particularly like it, but if it's the way > upstream ships things, there isn't much choice. wine is an example of this. wine-staging is provided as a separate tarball of patches that are applied before build. rob > >> If this is kosher, are there any examples of other >> packages doing this... > > glibc did that until Fedora 20. We eventually split out the files in > the tarball into individual source files, which was easy enough in our > case (and the files were Fedora-specific anyway). > > Thanks, > Florian > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
