Anthony Green wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 16:23 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
And I think "beecrypt-java-jni" waiting for a java package to
magically appear
is rather effete, and confuses rpm package names with file names unnecessarily.
Whatever you want to call it, the JNI library you packaged is completely
useless without the breecrypt java code. If there's no plan to package
the java code then there's no sense in producing the JNI library.
Then there's also no reason to rename to "beecrypt-java-jni" either.
I will insure that the "beecrypt-java" package is removed tomorrow.
73 de Jeff
