On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:43:34AM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 02/01/18 12:45 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:13:15PM +0000, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > >>[python-lmiwbem] > >> python2-lmiwbem-0.7.2-16.fc28.aarch64 requires boost-python >= 0:1.50.0 > >Hmm, boost-python was renamed to python2-boost, and then to boost-python2, and > >the Provides for the old name was lost in the second step. Is this intentional? > >/cc jwakely > > boost-python[23] is not a Python module, it's a C++ library. The rules > for naming of Python modules do not apply to this package. > > But I think it should still provide the old name. Agreed on both counts ;) I guess Provides:boost-python, boost-python%_isa must following the same lifecycle as %python_provide, i.e. when %python_provide switches the unversioned name to point to python3 version, boost-python should likewise stop pointing to boost-python2. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
