Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



De: "Adam Williamson" 

On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 13:34 +0100, nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I don't have a good history with %autosetup :) It tends to hate the patches I produce.

> Did you know you still can/have to pass it a prefix level? That tripped
> me up for a while. For most cases, you want:

> %autosetup -p1

That's probably what I needed last time, but it was faster to add a %patch line than to investigate :). I find out nowadays there are lots of things I could do better if only I had the time to look them up.

> If you have patches that apply at different levels, you can't use it,
> unless there's a trick I don't know about.

My patches are all -p1 as taught by ancient rpm lore, but sometimes I mix patches from other origins and those can be anything.


Thanks for the tip, I will try to remember it

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux