On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 10:20:13 +0100, you wrote: >I would like to hear opinion of other packagers about naming. We have >`parallel` utility implemented in Rust which is drop-in replacement for GNU >parallel. I was thinking how to name package and how people would expect it to >be named. So far options are: > >* rust-parallel >* parallel-rust >* parallel-rs > >I dislike first one because it is not ending up in completion while second and >third are quite good. To me the second and third make it look like the package is part of the existing parallel package - perhaps rust bindings to parallel - and not an entirely different program. In other words, I could see people install parallel-rust because "it must be part of the parallel package" based on its naming and not realize it is an entirely different program doing the same thing. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
