-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 10:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 09:24 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: > > Il 01/12/2017 20:20, Philip Kovacs ha scritto: > > > If I have version 1 of package foo, containing items bar, xxx, yyy, > > > zzz, i.e. > > > > > > foo-1 > > > ----- > > > bar > > > xxx > > > yyy > > > zzz > > > > > > and, for version 2, bar is split off to its own sub-package, foo-bar, > > > so that > > > the desired packaging becomes: > > > > > > foo-2 foo-bar-2 > > > ----- --------- > > > xxx bar > > > yyy > > > zzz > > > > > > with foo-bar permanently requiring foo going forward. How does one > > > structure the > > > Obsoletes/Requires such that foo-2 pulls in foo-bar-2 only once, > > > during the upgrade > > > from 1 to 2? > > > > > > What is the best practice for this? > > You need to add Obsoletes: foo < 2 Sorry, hit send too early. You need to add such obsoletes BOTH to foo and foo- bar. - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAloicagACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0wmsg/9HpU/b7rm2FjfV296awFOc+TlLyoIFNJNshoeWm44WvGOu+wGOXHpfjQ6 JUE+NtZTR/DRIr7IMsXDuHfNoHa4oAH2VxIbwq/PjmPZDPdmxq0D9I/JOwhZX3yI BUhqiDd9W5sB9Rv9ZWuuS359UnOgkSbrYKWUgYX2dlzP4oZGBij10RRU8KyLcTP7 NFcgyV4rkUnWUCndqP8rZLKyRR+vMc0ABiF8jXe8MoKOSDJdxaopgz/kaaxLyWBg 2Uvnn2gLanwIL/iaYWYabCG88pEq0JrR68HpeXFDChFGJGmiumJEoSsPois8WI9t r+DoZAfNDNowBsG69HyrPmRgZHVT26+/f1UsX+EwX0siEGyuoqowcpabDTdmQ6gW qTcDMZ6zQ5xLs/57GyrN/auE6kTmCyFsdaGHE6pUoL9vlna9NNBvqNFIItMMhhpO ffqeedxpRGQRsA0EaR/1kOEGpxJZkQEXW3/AheA0Yzb/O9O8McT4XwxfJPe/5uLg sr9+AYRkd2Akpz25IjIOIHhws9ienOiqZl0JI0mw/R24PPUmdVXTehNNh/NvJzDf nqrFcp8+XXpgsD2qakpwq9xbDTVIFIr7RHRMz5kohuy4cJuetim6e3onC/8Mej8O itLTGAcoK+XR8YOiIoxAbbAM05VA7SauAFv0DejUOvmFPeGR9S0= =1qgG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
