On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 04:33:07PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > The EPEL number you are presenting are bit unrelated number. You should > compare how many "enhancement" and "bugfix" updates were submitted in > EPEL versus Fedora (and actually you can't evaluate Fedora correctly > since there are no updates in Rawhide). In my domain (Ruby packages), > there are plenty of changes in packages in Fedora, mainly in Rawhide, > less in stable releases. In EPEL, there typically happens just one > single import and then the package stays in that state forever. How so? I'm not counting updates — these connection counts show repodata queries, so they happen even if there are no updates. My point here wasn't amount of change, but number of users. That said, I think EPEL _and_ Fedora OS users would benefit from being able to choose between having frequently updated Ruby packages _or_ the "single import, stays in that state barring a serious security issue" without having that choice be dependent on the base operating system. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
