On 5 Feb 2005, at 12:25, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
On 02/05/2005 10:49 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:Hi Ryan, On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 03:10, Ryan Gammon wrote:Ideally IMHO dmix / asym would:[..]- Open the sound device using sensible maximum capabilities of the device in terms of sampling rate and # of channels, etc. The guys who write our resamplers generally prefer to have helix doing any sample rate conversion where possible:Would fixed-samplerate do (e.g. fixed to 48kHz)? 99% of the users won't
http://lists.helixcommunity.org/pipermail/audio-dev/2004-March/ 000243.html
notice the difference if you're using a reasonably good resampler. On my
computer (don't know if this is generally true), dmix operates on a
fixed samplerate, regardless of playback.
Please, no! This sounds really bad to me (pun intended ;-) I own a card that can do hardware mixing and really don't like the idea of "being punished" for that. Especially by something like upsampling almost every sound I play from 44.1 to 48kHz. And yes, I will notice (is it really 99% of the users who won't? where does this number come from?) -- decent amplifier, cables and loudspeakers do just that: you start noticing.
The reason I'm really worried here is that I recall Colin Walters saying that dmix will be on for everybody in FC4:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-January/ msg00614.html
AFAIK, dmix will use software mixing *only* if your sound card doesn't support hardware mixing.
