Re: RFC: -Wl,--as-needed by default (and glibc ldconfig file trigger)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:54:13PM +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 21 November 2017 at 10:43, Igor Gnatenko
> <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:26 +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> >> So is it any final decision about start use by default --as-needed in
> >> linker options?
> >
> > Can you link Change Proposal you (or someone else) submitted? I have not heard
> > anything about that.
> 
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/3
> 
> [..]
> >> In my opinion number of affected packages will be very low (few).
> >
> > Counting numbers of affected packages by guessing is very bad idea.
> 
> Call it educated guess if you want.

You know, there is a way to get more reliable data: do scratch builds of
all Fedora packages and analyze the results. Then we'd know _exactly_
how many packages would need to be patched.

D.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux