On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:38:43 +0100, you wrote: >On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 15:15 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: >> On 11/16/17, cornel panceac <cpanceac@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > No Linux 4.14 ? >> >> Are you expecting 6 years support cycle? > >I think in a sense, many are...? >I know fedora is supposed to pretend rhel is "just" downstream's problem >but I see a lot of "redhat.com" emails here and when you ask red hat >instructors and affiliated about rhel8 they just say "ask fedora". >Nevertheless, right now everyone's crystal ball is hinting at a rhel8 >branched out of f27 (which may be nonsense), so the question of a >LTS kernel seems natural. My understanding / assumption is that while each new line of RHEL is based off of a given Fedora release, Red Hat does make tweaks / changes to suit the needs of what they offer. Thus, if you are correct and the hypothetical RHEL 8 is based on F27 there is no reason Red Hat wouldn't choose to use the 4.14 kernel regardless of what is in Fedora when they decide to branch. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
