On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 23:07 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 23:00 -0500, Charles R. Anderson wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 10:41:28PM +0000, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > > > Note to Seth: yum somehow siletly upgraded my i686 Linux to an i586 > > > one... > > > > Do you have exactarch=1 set in your yum.conf? Yes: grep exactarch /etc/yum.conf exactarch=1 > Another note - don't expect me to read every single message that comes > across f-d-l :) hehe sorry :) > if you think you've found a bug, let me know in bugzilla. :) I wish I knew when it happened. It started happening right after linux rpm 1090. In the meanwhile, yum was updated so it might have been a temporary problem! Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
