On 11/07/2017 03:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > During a package review rpmlint noted that the package did not own > /usr/share/metainfo. > > A cursory "rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/metainfo" returned no results. > > I know rpm can handle multiple packages owning a directory these days > but I don't think it is correct for a package only providing an appdata > file to own /usr/share/metainfo... > > So what package should? It's already owned by filesystem, in F27+. Just list /usr/share/metainfo/* in your package's %files and ignore the warnings on older Fedoras. -- Kalev _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
