Re: radical suggestion for fc4 release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nils Philippsen wrote:

On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 12:39 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:



Just musing ;-): Individual signatures on each header component, along with a signed list of components that should be present. That way, if


Smells too much like DNSSec to me.

Ever tried to babysit a DNSSEC config? PITA ...

something goes corrupt, you can find out what is broken ("URL not ok")
unless the list gets damaged and a list should be a smaller target to be
hit by random disaster than a complete header blob. This of course
doesn't bring any more security where malice is involved, but I can as
easily corrupt a complete header blob as I can the list or other single
components, so nothing lost here.



Hint: encrypted/signed files and certificate management are far more interesting problems.


So is exploding header meatadata into LDAP or WebDAV attributes.

73 de Jeff



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux