Re: Replacing HAL policy (yes, in 2017)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17 October 2017 at 10:14, Igor Gnatenko
<ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> today I was using dfu-programmer to update my nitrokey storage firmware
> and I found out that it is old version with some packaging bugs and
> also it contains file "%{_datadir}/hal/fdi/information/20thirdparty/10-
> dfu-programmer.fdi"..[0]

Would they be interested in fwupd support? Do you have any contacts at
Nitrokey I can talk to?

> I've never seen HAL in my life (probably when I was just starting with
> Linux) so my question is should I somehow write udev / policykit rule
> for it or just drop it?

Drop the HAL fdi file for sure, that's long obsolete.

Richard.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux