On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 14:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > It's really hard to say what the trouble > is... are there to few of them? Overtasked with other work? Workflow too > difficult? AFAIK it's basically just lvrabec at the moment, and I think the 'map' permission issues that showed up this cycle may have been keeping him pretty busy. Not sure if there are other factors involved. It seems like there's sort of been an idea floating around for a while that we should be trying to move SELinux policies out of the centralized selinux-policy package - e.g. the Apache-relevant policies should move into the httpd package, and so on - but I don't know any details about how serious / achievable that idea is. It *is* possible for packages to ship their own SELinux policies now, though, and some (not many) do. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
