Re: Interdependent packages *must* go in the same update - a reminder (ref. nss and nspr)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/12/2017 05:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> In this case there's an even worse consequence; if you do attempt to
> update to nss 3.33.0 without nspr 4.17.0 dnf will 'skip' *most* of the
> nss packages (as it notices that they are missing dependencies), but it
> *will* install nss-softokn-freebl . With this mix of packages (most of
> nss at 3.32.0, but nss-softokn-freebl at 3.33.0), nss and anything that
> depends on it just fails to work at all - e.g. curl and dnf...so that's
> an extremely bad outcome.

Then isn't this a packaging bug?  They currently use ">=" requirements,
but if a greater version doesn't work, shouldn't they be "="?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux