Re: Interdependent packages *must* go in the same update - a reminder (ref. nss and nspr)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 08:16 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 17:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > There are currently separate updates for nss 3.33.0 and nspr 4.17.0
> > in
> > both Fedora 26 and 27. However, nss 3.33.0 requires nspr 4.17.0.
> > 
> > As a reminder, this is a violation of the Updates Policy:
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Updating_inter-dependen
> > t_packages
> > 
> > "When one updated package requires another (or more than one other),
> > the packages should be submitted together as a single update."
> 
> The problem I face myself is when update requires new packages. And in
> that case what kind of "type" should I choose? enhancement or
> newpackage?

That's far less important. Especially the distinction between
enhancement and newpackage, I think, barely matters.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux