Re: Any plans for completing the go 1.9 rebase (to stable 1.9)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






----- Original Message -----
> From: "nicolas mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 11:41:09 AM
> Subject: Re: Any plans for completing the go 1.9 rebase (to stable 1.9)?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> BTW I have a set of Go packages I was preparing for inclusion that build fine
> with Go 1.8 in Epel 7 but not with Go 1.9 in rawhide.
> 
> Is there a way to check if it's a problem with the future Go 1.9 toolchain or
> a problem in the upstream code? I haven't have the time to investigate yet.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Nicolas Mailhot
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

It could be literaly anything as EPEL(read also as RHEL 7) and Fedora(27/Rawhide) are quite different distributions(looking at packages available and their versions).
If you can share build output (and spec file), we should be able to tell more. From big GC changes(that should be observable at build time) only parallel compilation pops on my mind as significant change between 1.8 and 1.9, apart of move to Power8+ as minimum supported(more at https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.9), but it shouldn't have significant side effects.

JC
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux