On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:50:11 +0000 (UTC), you wrote: >On 2017-09-26, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:18:12AM +0000, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> A packager is responsible for reviewing the code before uploading it to the >>> Fedora infrastructure. It does not mattter whether the code matches what >>> upstream released. Actually in some cases the code is intentionally >>> changed by the packagers (e.g. when removing bad-licensed code). >> >> Are there any tools you'd like to suggest for reviewing 100GB >> (or even 10MB) of code? >> >diff. First you review 100GB code, and then you review differences only. >Actually you do not need to review 100GB of code. You can unbudle it >first. I doubt the 100GB were written from scratch. That may be fine for any packagers who are actually paid to package (though even then I would have my doubts that every line of source has been checked), but it is clearly an impossible task in terms of time required for all the volunteer packagers. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
