Re: Change to bzip2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Iadonisi wrote:

On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 11:20 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:



And it also makes little sense to bzip tarballs that end up in gzipped payloads imho.



Which begs the question ... why has Red Hat (at least in some cases, historically), veered (admittedly only slightly) from the pristine source principle by uncompressing gzipped tarballs and recompressing them with bzip2 only to stuff them in into an rpm if rpm uses gzip?




Well that's a different qestion.

At the end of a release, there is invariably a fire drill to attempt
to fit on one fewer CD's.

Part of the exercise usually results in tarballs within *.src.rpm's being recompressed
to save space. Not that it saves much, nor ar *.src.rpm's usually part of the primary
battle.


Certainly the contents are not changed. All depends on whether you consider
recomprssing a modification to "pristine sources".

73 de Jeff


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux