Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Igor Gnatenko
<ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink
>  from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2..
>
> Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ?

IIRC, we've been doing this in Fedora ourselves since 2008 (and RHEL
hasn't shipped gpg1 since RHEL 5), so we should just go ahead and do
it. AFAIK, the only thing that matters that uses GPGv1 is sigul, but I
think Patrick Uiterwijk has or is porting it to gpg2.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux