On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > So I think F28/F29 would be best time for retiring YUM. Right now DNF > should be already stable and provide same capabilities (or documented > that something will not be supported). > > Hopefully infrastructure / rel-eng folks will finally add support for > rich dependencies[0] which would mean that yum will not work in Fedora > anyway, so.. > > Do you still have some critical missing functionality in DNF? And let > us know reasons why would you like to keep YUM available (hopefully > there are no)! > There is still one thing I've noticed we're missing: API and CLI for getting package changelogs[1]. This exists in yum but doesn't in dnf. In addition, don't we still need yum in the repositories for mock to target EL6 and EL7 for EPEL? [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066867 (CLI RFEs are blocked by this bug) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
