Le lundi 31 janvier 2005 Ã 17:44 -0500, Jeff Spaleta a Ãcrit : > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:37:29 -0500, Eric S. Raymond <esr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Oh, no. *Bad* idea. It's an attack on the symptom, not the problem. > > > > If changelogs are bloating the headers yum has to download, then > > strip them out when generating the yum headers. > > they bloat the packages as well... which means they bloat the install > media and bloat the download times over the network. > > I'm hard pressed to think of a real-world situation where 2 year old > package changelog notations in the packages are needed. Shouldn't > access to the cvs server suffice for deep-diving into package > changelogs? Aren't changelogs compressed yet ? I'm very surprised simple flat text data can make such a significant difference these days (the yum problem OTOH is real but can't yum truncat the changelogs it exports all by itself ?) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
