On 08/10/2017 02:15 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > After a successful scratch build[1] on fc27/i686 of ceph-2.1.2-2 to test > a fix for a 32-bit issue I immediately fired off a full fedpkg build, > which failed thusly [2]: > > ... > DEBUG util.py:439: Error: nothing provides librpm.so.7()(64bit) needed > by deltarpm-3.6-22.fc27.x86_64 > DEBUG util.py:439: (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to > replace conflicting packages) > ... > > the scratch build had rpm-4.13.0.1-41.fc27 and deltarpm-3.6-21.fc27 > > The fedpkg builds got rpm-4.13.90-0.git14002.1.fc27 and > deltarpm-3.6-22.fc27 (x86_64 at least, I didn't look at the others) > > Did I just catch things in an temporarily inconsistent state? I only > noticed the warning that rpm-4.14 is coming soon. Yep. :) The affected rebuilt packages against the new rpm are being signed now. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
