On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:15:24PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM: > >On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > >>bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > >> > >>boomaga > >>calligra > >>cups-filters > >>evas-generic-loaders > >>gambas3 > >>gdal > >>gdcm > >>inkscape > >>kf5-kfilemetadata > >>libreoffice > >>okular > >>pdf2djvu > >>poppler-sharp > >>texlive > >>texworks > > > >Welp, the rebuild of texlive failed, which means gdal can't be built, > >and I can't build openqa. And none of this seems to have been touched > >since yesterday, > > Umm? Did you really check? > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?order=-completion_time&userID=803 > > >so now it's probably going to be stuck over the > >weekend, right? > > > >Perhaps next time, you could test rebuilds of at least major things > >like texlive against the new poppler *before* you land the new poppler > >into rawhide? Thanks. > > And then, if test rebuild of such a big package like texlive against > new poppler fails, poppler maintainer has to wait until texlive is > to be ported into new poppler? Yes! That's how the new "no alphas" rawhide is supposed to look. Maintainers are supposed to avoid a state where rawhide is broken. poppler shouldn't be *blocked*, but it should be delayed a bit, so that maintainers of the dependent packages are given a few days to find a resolution. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
