On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:43:51PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser <fnasser@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > >> > >> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: > >> > >> > >> Is it only RHEL? > >> > >> What are other distros doing? > >> > > > > It is only RHEL, but unfortunately that has a *huge* knock on effect > > across hundreds of derivative distribution projects and products. > > > > It's an enormous problem that they're doing this... > > Hmmm, that sounds backwards to me. I would say it is more a problem > that Btrfs haven't reached a stability/trust level over so many years > which makes Enterprise Linux considering to use it. To me this more > indicates the overall state of Btrfs. There's more to Enteprise Linux than Red Hat. SUSE is happy to support subset of btrfs' features for enterprise distribution.. > I certainly do hope that Btrfs development doesn't slow down by this, > rather that the pace gets improved and it will come back again in > stronger and more solid during a future RHEL 8 release. Red Hat has none (I think) developers working on btrfs. So btrfs development speed is not affected by this. At all. -- Tomasz Torcz Once you've read the dictionary, xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx every other book is just a remix. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
