Re: State of Sparkleshare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga
<luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/08/17 01:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga
>> <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> As a maintainer of Fedora Design Suite, the state of sparkleshare brought attention with these outstanding report:
>>> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789
>>> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172
>>>
>>> Considering the critical vulnerability of the dependent package webkitgtk, will it be possible for a proven package updating Sparkleshare to the latest stable release
>>> as the Design Team depends on it?
>> The mono maintainers should be able to assist with that and are likely
>> best suited.
>>
>
> Thank you. I am contacting one of them.

If it's critical for the design team I also suggest getting one of the
Design team to become a co-maintainer of the package to ensure you
have some level of control over it.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux