Re: Are we going to do another mass rebuild for ppc64le problems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:42:00AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > It looks like the mass rebuild completed.  However I have quite a few
> > packages which failed because of the ppc64le / binutils(?) /
> > "localentry:0" thing.  Are we going to do another mass rebuild to fix
> > this?
> 
> Yes, I believe the plan is to do a partial arch specific (IE not all
> the noarch python/perl/ruby/etc packages) rebuild.

Thanks Peter, in that case I'll hold off on the OCaml update
(https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6906).

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux