highlight-3.36-3.fc27 suddenly has a Requires: /bin/lua: $ rpm -qp --requires https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/highlight/3.39/1.fc27/x86_64/highlight-3.39-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm /bin/lua config(highlight) = 3.39-1.fc27 libc.so.6()(64bit) … I have verified that this comes from the /usr/share/doc/highlight/examples/json/theme2json.lua file installed by the package. The immediate result is that highlight is uninstallable because nothing provides /bin/lua. We could patch the example file to use #!/usr/bin/lua instead, but IMHO it's not reasonable that a mere example in the documentation introduces a hard dependency. Is this the expected behavior? Shall I file a bug against rpm? Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
