Re: libglvnd-egl needed for X: should it be in base-x comps group? Or should something require it?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 01:49 -0400, David Airlie wrote:

> > So, should this package be added to base-x ? Should something depend on
> > it? Should X actually start up without libEGL.so.1, and I should file
> > *that* as a bug? Thanks!
> 
> Hans might answer this better, but X should start fine without libEGL.so.1,
> that's a client library.

glamor needs libEGL too. But it does so through libepoxy, which doesn't
have a DT_NEEDED for it (or libGL) because it's all dlopen magic
instead.

xorg-x11-server-{Xorg,Xwayland} should grow at least a Recommends for
libEGL and libGL.

- ajax
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux