Switch a package from noarch to arch - current guidelines?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Turns out that Elixir should not be noarch, as some of its code is endianness specific. What's best practice to switch away from noarch for packages in current Fedora? How about EPEL?

I see this outdated and unresolved Packaging Comittee issue... https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/117 

and I see a bunch of bugs referring to specs (and rpms) that fail during upgrades. Some have obsoletes on their own name, others don't. 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753149
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230183
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301306

Is there clarity / consensus on this? Any packages that have made the transition successfully recently?

cheers,



martin
--
 - ask interesting questions  ~  http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff
 - don't be distracted        ~  http://github.com/martin-langhoff
   by shiny stuff
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux