seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > What is the amount of time/memory/etc used during reading of this > > extraneous data? > > well you're almost doubling the amount of data to read in/sort through. > > from what I've seen it goes pretty linearly with the number of nodes. > > So figure something like a 1/3rd or half as much time to iterate over > the nodes. But how much is this time related to the other time in processing/dep resolution/etc. I mean, if it ends up shaving only .1 seconds... Bill
