Re: libglvnd-egl needed for X: should it be in base-x comps group? Or should something require it?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 25.7.2017 v 04:04 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> Hi folks! Wanted to run this up the flagpole somewhere before I just
> went and did it...
>
> We have a couple of openQA tests which just run Firefox on top of a
> bare X server to do some browser tests. Up to now just 'dnf
> groupinstall base-x' then 'dnf groupinstall firefox', then 'startx
> /usr/bin/firefox', was enough; but now in Rawhide it seems like X fails
> to start if only the 'base-x' package group is installed, it fails
> looking for libEGL.so.1:
>
> https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/137965#step/server_cockpit_default/19
>
> This file seems to be in the libglvnd-egl package, which it seems
> doesn't get installed along with base-x.
>
> So, should this package be added to base-x ? Should something depend on
> it? Should X actually start up without libEGL.so.1, and I should file
> *that* as a bug? Thanks!

Actually, recently I updated rubygem-capybara and rubygem-cucumber-rails
and I wanted to enable test suite for them, but some of the tests
require Firefox. So it would be nice if BR: firefox installed everything
needed for Firefox. I am afraid I cannot install base-x group for build
neither I want to reflect the content of base-x in the .spec file.


Vít
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux