On the same note, when the new (2.9.x) panel for gnome was built, someone it seems forgot to reenable the eds stuff. I do use it. Trever On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 13:22 -0500, David Hollis wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 10:11 -0600, Edginton, Brian (GE Healthcare) > wrote: > > I think there needs to be some discussion about keeping, at least packages in the same general family, sync'd with each other in rawhide. I know this horse has been beating to near death but it certainly interferes with comprehensive testing and getting the feedback necessary to move fedora forward. > > > > Case in point, evolution and evolution-data-server move forward to 2.1.4 in rawhide. Evolution-connector lags behind, because of it's dependencies on old libgal, libe*'s, etc. > > So now in this test environment mail is completely useless. > > > > Is there a way to encourage, or preferably enforce, keeping the wavefront coherent? > > > > edge > > > > If you have an important workstation/server, you really shouldn't be > running from Rawhide. Things get out of sync, break, get your cat > pregnant, etc. all the time. You can't expect real stability until the > few weeks prior to release when everything freezes and the various > glitches are worked out. If there was any mandate to keep Rawhide > stable at all times, it would be the equivalent of production and they > would have to put out Beta/RC releases for Rawhide! Then we'd never see > anything go anywhere. > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- "If there was strife and contention in the home, very little else in life could compensate for it." -- Lawana Blackwell, The Courtship of the Vicar's Daughter, 1998
