Re: Blocker bug process proposal: waiving late-discovered blockers to next release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A blocker ought to be a blocker, no matter when it is discovered and how
long it takes to fix.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405539

It violates a release criterion (IMO), but it's been broken forever and fixing it would be a complex engineering project, far beyond the scope of our usual blocker issues. Do we really want to block Fedora for months on such an issue? F26 would probably be delayed until next year if that was our policy.

Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux