> I think it is correct to move src.rpms and debuginfo out of the default > path. Instead of moving this to the user to enable/disable it, I thought > to use differently named files within the repodata. > All information about src.rpms goes to new filenames and you can trigger > reading in the debuginfo files if a "*-debuginfo" package name is needed. > > This puts the namespace question to the repodata and is adding special > interpretation to rpm package names ("*-debuginfo"), but tries to get > all this more transparent to the user compared to offering this via > configured repo locations. > > ?? Both ways have their pros and cons. The con of doing it the way you're describing is that it implicitly dictates something about the repository structure. Not sure I like that. But i see your point about having them magically enabled. The only problem is that for depsolving it doesn't make it much easier. -sv