On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:17:46 -0000 Samuel Rakitničan <srakitnican@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Argument 4 is the "n". The problem is with the definition of > > "PRIo64. There was a recent commit attempting to fix that, but it > > probably needs some adjustment to handle your case. Check out the > > lines around line 48 in that file and see if you can patch it to > > work in all cases. The odd thing is that it only doesn't work on > > epel7. I guess you need to compare how old the compiler is on > > there compared to the Fedora versions. > > So Joseph and I managed to fix this for epel7 with following patch: > > src/cbang/tar/TarHeader.cpp | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/cbang/tar/TarHeader.cpp b/src/cbang/tar/TarHeader.cpp > index 470b37c..50df710 100644 > --- a/src/cbang/tar/TarHeader.cpp > +++ b/src/cbang/tar/TarHeader.cpp > @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ > #endif > > #ifndef PRIo64 > -#if defined(_M_X64) || (defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ILP32__)) > +#if defined(_M_X64) || (defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ILP32__)) > || \ > + defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__ppc64__) || defined(__PPC64__) > #define PRIo64 "lo" > #else > #define PRIo64 "llo" > > It seems GCC 4.8 needs these macros defined explicitly, while GCC > 6 > inherits it from something else (_M_X64 perhaps?), thoughts? I guess it depends if (and how) inttypes.h header gets included, it's provided by glibc. Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
