Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11 July 2017 at 16:57, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 at 22:26, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> I ran into this unannounced change:
>>>
>>>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
>>
>> I noticed this is categorized as self-contained, which I think is wrong.
>>
>> I also have hardware that would no longer run Fedora after such change
>> (a netbook with an older Intel Atom CPU which supports SSE2, but is
>> 32bit). Unless the change proponent can provide some numbers suggesting
>> that 32bit users are a tiny minority of our userbase, I'll probably
>> be against such change.
>
> Anyone with 32-bit hardware is going to be against this change.  It is
> a known downside.  It also doesn't change the fact that i686 kernels
> are in a zombie state, where the kernel team does not actively support
> them and the community has not significantly stepped up to do so.
> That approach was done quite a while ago, and explicitly communicated.
>
> The fact that i686 kernels continue to work in general is basically luck.

Or that they have been broken at various times and no one noticed.



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux