Re: [Modularity] A proposal for stream naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 04:07:43PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> 
> Each such "collection" module MUST have one or both of the following:
> 
>   * A "latest" rolling stream (As above, this would be separate from
>     "rawhide", as "latest stable", but could update frequently and
>     arbitrarily.)
> 
>   * One or more streams corresponding to "end of life no earlier than",
>     in the format "YYMM". (Or "eolYYMM"? Or "eYYMM"? Or "uYYMM" for
>     'until'? Or "fYYMM" for 'fedora' — which might make sense if we get
>     to my dream of mixing and matching with CentOS modules....)

Please make the year a full four-digit YYYY value. Typing that extra
"20" will not hurt anybody and the chance for confusion will be much
smaller.

-- 
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, OpenShift Security Team, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux