Re: [Modularity] A proposal for stream naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:29:29PM +0200, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> However, considering this from a different angle, a LAMP stack module,
> for example, might just need to make a certain API/ABI promise and then
> it could roll for quite a while.  This would be without regard to the
> changes in the underlying software versions, as long as what was
> promised on the wrapper was still met.  If this is the case then
> "collections" are no different from "single applications."

In terms of EOL, right. But collections have no obvious intrinsic
version number to use as the major stream identifier, whereas
applications (and environments and stacks) do.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux