Re: Intel i915 firmwares

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:20:13AM -0400, David Airlie wrote:
> > 
> > > I ran into this today:
> > > https://gist.github.com/Brainiarc7/aa43570f512906e882ad6cdd835efe57
> > > 
> > > DRM firmware is loaded by default. HuC and GuC are not. Things work
> > > without them, and things work with them loaded. So what's the pro/con
> > > and if there's a pro, why isn't it the kernel default? Seems like if
> > > it should be default, either upstream should set them as the default,
> > > or the CPU/GPU should ask for it?
> > 
> > I expect when upstream decided they are stable and useful enough, upstream
> > will enable them. I'm not fully sure how useful they are, I think they
> > might possibly enable lower power states, but also nasty bugs.
> 
>   The same upstream which did not release stable version of Xorg Intel driver
> for past three years? ;-)
>   According to the link, the firmwares are needed for HDMI audio, which is
> quite critical functionality.  HDMI audio for older chipsets did not
> require binary blobs, so this is kind of regression.

That might be the reason why I had to blacklist the snd-hdmi-lpe-audio module
on my system. Pulseaudio crashed trying to access the HDMI audio device.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux