Re: Fedora Modules & Fedora 27 Server Edition (Changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 22:07 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> I cannot argue with the criteria as you have set forth.  However, I
> never said we should block the release.  I said it should work on the
> architectures it does today.  That is more than x86_64.  We *know* we
> have significant interest from multiple parties around Server on other
> architectures.  This comes from both the project sponsor and from
> parties representing those architectures.  They are even participating
> members in the Server WG.  So while you may not hold a Fedora release
> for it, I do not think it is out of line to come into a Modular Server
> release with the intention of it actually working across multiple CPU
> architectures.

Well, there is of course potentially a gap between "the intention of it
actually working" and...actually working :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux