On 23 June 2017 at 12:33, Haïkel <hguemar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2017-06-23 12:39 GMT+02:00 James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi, >> >> Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him? >> >> I've been attempting to contact for this bug: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223593 >> >> If there's no response in one week an issue will be filed with FESCo >> following the nonrepsonsive maintainer policy to review the ownership >> status of the packages. >> >> For ruby maintainers please note that this has a significant impact on >> you, if you want to keep track of this, as he owns puppet, rubygems >> and ruby ... >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/kanarip/ >> > > You're making it sound like Puppet is unmaintained which is not accurate. > There are many comaintainers and provenpackagers working on it. > Indeed it has been updated, though facter which it depends on has not, but the point being following our processes ... should there be deemed a need for a mass orphaning of his packages then someone needs to pick it up. In addition whilst he maintains POC for it as the "owner" the default assignee of bugs goes to him ... If ruby and puppet maintainers didn't notice the orphaning as a result... then they would be at risk of (temporary) retirement which could cause confusion for a bit, rather than notifying and sorting it all out at once :) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
