Re: Better repodata performance (was: redhat abe)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 17:11 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2005, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > How about having multiple repodatas, the base one and small
> > incremental ones, the incremental ones containing also package
> > cancelations? As a side effect this would also reduce download
> > bandwidth and thus make even clients/users happy (not only repo
> > maintainers).
> 
> +1.  Heck, make it +2.
> 
> I agree with Axel, for a change :-)
> 

How would it reduce bandwidth - you'd have to download and parse
multiple entries and you'd STILL have to do just a much work on the
repo-side b/c you'd have to check all the packages for changes.

-sv



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux