On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 15:34 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > If it really is historical, we're through such a sea change with the way > debuginfo is being done now that we should fix things to not require a > hidden directory. It's simply a bad idea. > > "Fixing" rpmlint to complain about such things isn't really the right > answer, since the complaints are valid. The rpmlint fix really is just a two line patch adding the dir name to the expected file list. It does seem a bit late to change the name now. And it would require coordination with the various tools that depend on and search for ".build-id" directories now (rpm, binutils, elfutils, valgrind, systemtap, gdb, etc.). But if there is a concrete proposal we could try to push it upstream. Maybe do that as a separate change request though when all upstreams have been adjusted? Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
