Re: Outdated %fpc_arches macro?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Artur,

I'm the one to blame for the beginnings of the fpc_arches macro. This idea was born from a package review [1] and implementation started with a FESCO ticket [2]. The legacy ticket #608 should be ported with the same number from fedorahosted.org with the big move to pagure.io, I can't verify currently cause pagure.io is down for me.

I'm wondering what to do about ppc64le [1] as well besides ppc64 only [2]?

Please also notice you have to block for the specificly failing architectures trackers with separate bug reports [3].

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299127#c6
[2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/EAUKQDPUPNDAZPFIF6JM4U42Z2DC6U62/
[2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/NK6NUWOBQ2IEJHD65SFPLVJPVEKYA7ZW/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux