On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 16:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 22:38 +0000, till@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > os-autoinst adamwill 73 weeks ago > > Uh. What? I built this for fc26 in April. That's not 73 weeks ago. And > 'dnf install os-autoinst' does not report any broken dependencies. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=878719 > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2a2d78207d Oh, I see the problem now, though it doesn't explain the '73 weeks ago': [os-autoinst] os-autoinst-openvswitch-4.4-18.20170410git97928a2.fc26.armv7hl requires openvswitch [os-autoinst] os-autoinst-openvswitch-4.4-18.20170410git97928a2.fc26.ppc64 requires openvswitch so the problem is that the current stable openvswitch was not built for two arches; the openvswitch package currently in updates-testing *is* built for those arches, however. It seems pointless to send out an update that disables the subpackage for two arches for a few days until openvswitch is pushed stable. Perhaps the proliferation of arches in primary Koji might cause a rethink of how this automatic retirement works? It wouldn't seem to be a good idea to automatically retire this package (which is in fact quite important, and under active maintenance) on this basis. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
