On 05/19/2017 09:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 05/19/2017 10:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:48:37AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:44:57AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >>>> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234930 >>>> >>>> It's my understanding this functioanlity is already being worked on in >>>> DNF 2.0, to match the yum functionality of "sudo yum upgrade >>>> --advisory FEDORA-2017-30604deb62" >>> >>> Yeah, I just tested and this works: >>> >>> $ sudo dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2017-f590422f5b >> Oh, that's super nice. >> >> Randy, what about redirecting the effort to support the same for koji >> builds? I think that functionality is missing and it'd be quite useful >> for packagers (e.g. to test that an update will be OK before actually creating >> the update): >> dnf install-koji 886677,886693 >> or even >> dnf install-koji package-version,package-version >> ? > > I think a koji dnf plugin could be very handy, especially if it tried to > download signed packages for you (if available). > > Also possibly handy: > > dnf install koji f26-build firefox > (latest firefox in f26-build tag) > > dnf update koji f26-build > (update any packages newer from the f26 build tag) For f26-build it's easy. cat >/etc/yum.repos.d/koji.repo <<"EOF" [koji-f26-build] name=koji-f26-build baseurl=https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f26-build/latest/$basearch/ enabled=0 EOF dnf --enablerepo koji-f26-build install firefox dnf --enablerepo koji-f26-build update etc. But installing arbitrary builds, like Zbyszek wants, it's not that simple since they are possibly not included in any repos at all... -- Mikolaj Izdebski Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
